(For TMA 690)
Literacy, pedagogy, and access combined made for a pretty
broad scope within one week’s focus, but I was able to find considerable
material for reflection. I anticipate
that a large portion of my application for course content will be in providing
education, training, and resources for parents to use to increase media
literacy in the home.
The Core MLE principles are a fantastic springboard for beginning conversations with
parents about the need and relevance of media literacy. I hope we will be covering these principles
in more depth in this course, I hope to accumulate more resources for promoting
these principles and concepts.
Democracy and Education (chapters 1 &3) touched on all 3 topics of interest this
week, but I felt its most valuable and sizeable contribution to the dialogue
was in its encouragement to pedagogically enlist students’ own interest and
effort in increasing their (relevant) education. Calling this “educative results of teaching,”
a student who is gaining practice in critical thinking gains a long term tool
for increasing their scope of understanding and processing information, rather
than just accumulating information.
There was also support in this document for balancing formal and
informal approaches to education and especially for conjoint activities that allow for “full participation” from
students and encourage exploration and a mastery of the context and properties
of the explored medium. This reminded me
a lot of Montessori methods of education, which promote child-led learning.
Pedagogy of the Oppressed (chapters 1&2) was a little trickier to make direct
correlations through for the first chapter, though most of those I did find
were linked to access. The second chapter
was more directly applicable with pedagogy, especially encouraging learning
that can only occur in an environment of trust and mutual respect between
teacher and student, both willing to learn from each other.
The
overarching message of the pedagogical content of the reading was the need to
assist students in developing critical thinking skills, as opposed to
shorter-term, more measureable ends such as test scores or accurate
regurgitation of information. This can
be especially challenging for parents who can’t so easily organize their
interactions with their children to always remain cognizant of the learning and
teaching opportunities afforded them.
The formal/informal teaching balance mentioned in Democracy and Education becomes a valuable concept here.
Friere’s
concept of trust in the teacher/student relationship has myriad applications to
parent/child relationships as well, especially in trying to empower media users
rather than just protect them from undesirable content. His principle of encouraging real dialogue
has tremendous potential in a family setting, as well as some additional
challenges that may not be present in a classroom setting.
Addressing
access, I’m always terribly interested in dissecting the social injustices that
slip almost unnoticed into the fabric of cultural socialization. Most people that I’m able to interact with
have pretty consistent access to media and technology via the internet, but
often don’t know where to find voices that resonate with their life experience
or lives that look like theirs in media that still has meaning and creates
engaging, relevant narratives. Rather
than access to the medium, the struggle becomes access to material relevant to
their view of self and lived experience. I think this struggle is particularly relevant
for those feeling ostracized across issues of gender, disability, and unconventional
interests, or even precocity. I have a dear friend whose 7 year old daughter is a genius. She’s qualified to skip grades and reads novels
far above the age appropriate reading level. (Compared to my 7 year old who is
still learning to read) She’s more often
than not found wearing her Darth Vader helmet, and she loves building with Legos,
all while wearing pink tulle skirts.
She has a really hard time accessing a media reality that accommodates the parameters of her experienced reality. She doesn’t fit anyone’s marketing demographic, and she feels it. Luckily she has a mother who engages in precisely the kind of dialogue we are promoting here. This is most fortunate as they are together working to counter the unhealthy undercurrent of dieting and body-image culture that permeates grade school girls in her area. (Likely in most areas)
She has a really hard time accessing a media reality that accommodates the parameters of her experienced reality. She doesn’t fit anyone’s marketing demographic, and she feels it. Luckily she has a mother who engages in precisely the kind of dialogue we are promoting here. This is most fortunate as they are together working to counter the unhealthy undercurrent of dieting and body-image culture that permeates grade school girls in her area. (Likely in most areas)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete