At the end of his essay, Black Spectatorship: Problems of
Identification and Resistance, Manthia Diawara[1]
proposes that “one of the roles of black independent cinema, therefore, must be
to increase spectator awareness of the impossibility of an uncritical
acceptance of Hollywood products.” Spike
Lee appears to have taken this to heart, as he mixes satirical elements from
texts like Sunset Boulevard and Vanity Fair to create a devastating look
at the problems of black representation in media and in media production.
Lee clearly views himself as one of Frantz Fanon’s
“intellectual elite”[2]
amongst the empirically oppressed. His
work here seems directed at inciting uncomfortable introspection and ultimately
paradigmatic shifts in the narrative treatment of black people. Fanon said the “native writer (would)
progressively (take) on the habit of addressing his own people,” creating a
“Literature of Combat” that calls on the people to fight for their “existence
as a nation.” In this case the fight
seems to be for their “existence as a(dignified)culture.” Which, as Diawara
also pointed out, cannot simply try to embrace a pre-colonialized version of
itself, nor can it mimic the structure of the culture that colonized and
oppressed it. It must involve an
awareness of it’s own history and oppression, and find a way to make something
unifying compelling, and propelling out of them.
But in contrast with Fanon’s textual suggestions, Lee’s film
seems to primarily indict black people themselves for their own toleration and
furtherance of negativity regarding their race.
(Rather than inciting black people to revolt against external
oppressors, there seems to be something more internal to his scrutiny) There
are only two white characters who appear in more than once scene, and each of
them tries (unsuccessfully as portrayed by Lee) to identify as black. The “black” that each of them identifies with
are stereotypical reductions of race that Lee tries hard to decimate.[3]
Primarily, then, Lee is grappling with what “Black” identity does and should
mean. Though he doesn’t come up with an
answer in this text, he explores an entire spectrum of essentialist stereotypes
that should not be limiting the parameters of Black Culture in the US, but
which are consistently reinforced from without and from within.
One of the more interesting ways that Lee frames these
negative ideas of “Blackness” as false and oppressive, is by careful use of the
cinematic tool discussed by Stam and Spence[4] – that
of “circling.” It happens repetitively
in the film that the characters being visually identified with in a scene are
suddenly assaulted or threatened from an unanticipated, seemingly unprovoked
external force.
The first incident of circling is rather mild – as Delacroix
feels singled out an oppressed when he is late to his work meeting because
neither he nor his (Black) assistant were informed about it. He is accused of pulling a “Rodman” which is
clearly a parallel drawn based more on race than on performance. Combined with the information that surfaces
regarding Delacroix’s failed attempts at creating positive or dynamic
television shows about Black characters, this circling establishes Delacroix
and Sloan’s workplace as an environment prohibitive for their success based on
their race and the assumptions about it carried by their non-black
coworkers.
The second instance of circling is when Manray and Womack
are suddenly required to evacuate the vacant building they’ve been living
in. This scene seems largely intended to
explain their willingness to take on the assignment from Delacroix of wearing
blackface and participating in a minstrel show.
But it also demonstrates assumptions made by (white) police officers
about black people that go unchecked in this scene and are reinforced in the
final circling by police toward the end of the film.
Another scene that takes on the assaultedness of a circling
is when Sloan, Manray, and Womack are watching the premiere of their show on
television and are stunned by the sponsored television ads attached to their
show. Lee accused “a lot of gangster rap
music videos (of being) minstrel shows in themselves,” and this parallel
becomes overt with the ad for the alcoholic rocket-shaped drink and it’s heinous
depictions of debase black stereotypes. Bot
h types of minstrel shows here are equally guilty of what Stam and Spence
called “making the inhabitants of the Third World objects of spectacle for the
First World’s voyeuristic gaze.”
The most overt “circling” scenes are the most violent. When Manray is abducted by the Mau Mau, we
are at the end of a scene where we are made to identify with him more than at
any previous point in the film. Through
sympathetic use of music and silence, a refusal to apply the blackface, and
more close-ups than usual, he is at his apex of seeming most human when he is
poorly treated and evicted from the television studio. That he is immediately thereafter abducted by
the Mau Mau, (who are ironically always seen drinking the rocket drink that
sponsored the Mantan Minstrel show) and then slaughtered by them in a scene
that is both a visual and a figurative “circling” is very telling about Lee’s
frustration with groups that conflate violence with Blackness.
That violent scene is also created, visually and aurally, to
draw a strong parallel to the actual minstrel show. It is also broadcast on television – creating
a strong parallel between Mantay’s exploitation in the Mantan Show and the
accusation by Lee that Violence-oriented Black rappers are essentially creating
a modern disgraceful equivalent of Minstrel Shows. In their attempt to express their frustration
with the representation of Blacks in minstrel shows, the Mau Mau merely create
a more violent copy of the same thing.
That this scene is immediately followed by a subsequent
circling in which the Mau Mau are slaughtered in direct parallel with the
previous sequence by the police. That
the one white-skinned member of Mau Mau is not shot, but rather taken into
custody while the rest of the group is shown (in medium close-ups) lying dead
and bleeding on the ground indicates that both the police and the Mau Mau have
adopted similar beliefs that Blackness equals violence, even if they are
manifest in different types of behavior.
Delacroix is then twice circled – once by his blackface
paraphernalia in a surreal and more symbolic scene, and then directly by Sloan,
who tries to force him at gunpoint to watch the video clips of blackface and
stereotypical Black comedy on the tape she had previously compiled. His noncompliance leads to an escalation in
which she shoots him and leaves him dying, forced in his last moments to watch
the harrowing tape. Ultimately we are
left with the weight of a Shakespearean “All are Punished.”
It is interesting that Lee did not provide a positive
counterpoint to his guilty cast of racist Blacks. He doesn’t appear to be proposing a solution,
only specifying a problem. In many ways
he is pointing out that Racial equality is not yet a moot point, and that
post-post-colonialist attitudes, such as that voiced by the VP character
Dunwitty that “Who wants to be politically correct these days anyway?” are hugely problematic. The thrust of his argument seems to parallel
Angela McRobbie’s[5]
concerns about post-feminism: that an emancipatory movement is being deemed
“out of touch and out of style” by even those who need to be emancipated before
any type of equality is ever actually achieved.
Racism, especially as defined by Stam and Spence is still an issue, “The
generalized and final assigning of values to real or imaginary differences, to
the accuser’s benefit and at his victim’s expense, in order to justify the
former’s own privilege or aggression… always a rationale for an already
existing or contemplated oppression.” Lee clearly implicates Blacks and their
participation in music and television as being unacceptably racist. He has created a difficult text intended to
demand resistance from its reader and to evoke introspection about what else
they ought to be resisting.
[1] Diawara,
Manthia. "Black Spectatorship: Problems of Identification and
Resistance."Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings. Comp.
Leo Braudy and Marshall Cohen. New York: Oxford UP, 2004. 892-900. Print.
[2] Fanon,
Frantz. "From: The Wretched of the Earth, From: On National Culture;
Reciprocal Bases of National Culture and the Fight for Freedom." The
Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Comp. Vincent B. Leitch. New
York: W.W. Norton &, 2010. 1437-446. Print.
[3]
Lee said in interview: “History is filled with white people who have
tried to become blacker. Take Elvis
Presley… even today, groups like N’Sync and the Backstreet Boys. Culture is for everybody, but there is a
difference between appreciating a culture and appropriating a culture.” http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2000/10/20/about-face-an-interview-with-spike/
[4] Stam, Robert,
and Louise Spence. "Colonialism, Racism, and Representation: An
Introduction." Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings.
Comp. Leo Braudy and Marshall Cohen. New York: Oxford UP, 2004. 877-91. Print.
[5] McRobbie,
Angela. "Post‐feminism and Popular Culture." Feminist
Media Studies 4.3 (2004): 255-64. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment